A Small Challenge to Impunity - Lawsuit Against Former Synthes CEO Proceeds
Numerous allegations of bad behavior by big health care organizations, some apparently causing patient harm, have resulted in legal settlements, sometimes of criminal charges. Yet rarely do the individuals who apparently authorized, directed, or implemented the bad beahvior suffer any negative consequences. In particular, the top executives on whose watch the bad behavior occured seem to have impunity.
Suing the Former Synthes CEO
So it is news that a lawsuit will proceed against the former CEO of medical device company Synthes, alleging actions that led to the death of a patient. The basics were reported by the Daily Caller,
Furthermore,
Also,
These are only allegations, of course. However, again, it is very rare for any top executive of a health care organization to personally face a lawsuit for his or her organization's conduct, no matter how bad that conduct may be.
The Synthes Case Up to Now
We already knew that Synthes' conduct was particularly bad. We last discussed the Synthes case in 2011. The case was already extraordinary in that it resulted in criminal convictions of several high-ranking Synthes executives. At that time we wrote:
In 2011, Wyss agreed to sell Synthes to Johnson and Johnson, itself a company with a very chequered past (look here), thus making himself into a multi-billionaire, and one of the world's richest men. (Currently, Forbes lists Wyss as number 240 on its list of the world's richest, estimating his fortune at $6.1 billion.)
The case then slipped into relative obscurity, although Fortune ran a long-form article on it in 2012, which called it a "medical horror story."
An Almost Anechoic Lawsuit
Because of the unusual nature of the ongoing lawsuit, one might expect that it would generate some public discussion. One would be wrong. The litigation against Mr Wyss so far has received almost no media coverage, demonstrating the ongoing anechoic effect. We previous defined the anechoic effect, as the phenomenon that information or discussion that could challenge or discomfit the powers that be in the US health care often generates no echoes.
To date, I could only find coverage of the ongoing lawsuit against Mr Wyss in the Daily Caller. And ironically the Daily Caller did not appear to cover this case because it specializes in malfeasance in health care. It seemed to cover it because it may have indirectly reflected negatively on prominent members of the US Democratic Party.
Actually, the main focus of the article I quoted above was not health care. It was that Mr Wyss appears to be a supporter of Hilary Clinton, the currently leading Democratic candidate for the US presidential nomination, and of ostensibly left-wing causes. I put an ellipsis in the first sentence of the article to allow me to focus on its health care aspects. What I removed was not a description of Mr Wyss not as an extremely rich former CEO of a medical device company, but as
And the article's title similarly did not mention health care at all:
The Daily Caller actually specializes not in health care malfeasance, but in issues of interest to the right wing. As Politico reported in 2014, Tucker Carlson, described as a "conservative pundit, who founded the Daily Caller, has said
The Columbia Journalism Review described the Daily Caller as having
But whether of not the Daily Caller had an axe to grind when making its choice to report on the ongoing litigation against Mr Wyss, why did every other media outlet to ignore the story? Perhaps again the rule is in general it is simply not done to publicly discuss what might excessively embarass the people who have gotten very rich from the currently dysfunctional health care system?
Conclusions
The just revealed story of the lawsuit against the extremely rich former CEO of Synthes does suggest that perhaps individuals injured by our curent dysfunctional health care system could use the legal system to try to challenge those who get rich from enabling such injuries. Or not, because the outcome of this lawsuit is uncertain.
Furthermore, the initiation of this lawsuit again reminds us that those who lead large health care organizations, and may profit mightily from them, regardless of the effects on patients' and the public's health, remain beyond the law. It is not clear why the US Department of Justice chose not to even attempt to prosecute Mr Wyss, although they apparently believed he was responsible for directing the actions that led to patient deeaths. But his impunity mirrors that granted to just about every top health care manager who authorized or directed corporate bad behavior that endangered patients.
This impunity is further enabled by how anechoic stories of bad leadership of health care organizations, even of apparently criminal or corrupt leadership, are. As long as most health care professionals and the public at large remain unaware of the dark side of health care, they are unlikely to seek light to shed upon it.
True health care reform would encourage open, widespread discussion of all aspects of health care dysfunction, particularly bad behavior by those who profit most from it, and would encourage health care leadership that puts patients' and the public health first, is willing to be accountable for its actions, is transparent, honest and ethical.
Suing the Former Synthes CEO
So it is news that a lawsuit will proceed against the former CEO of medical device company Synthes, alleging actions that led to the death of a patient. The basics were reported by the Daily Caller,
Hansjorg Wyss ... will face charges of running a 'criminal profiteering enterprise' through the illegal use of a drug and in violation of federal patient safety rules that resulted in the death of a 67-year old woman....
Washington State Superior Court Judge Dean Lum agreed Oct. 30 that Wyss, a Swiss billionaire ... can stand trial under the state’s racketeering laws for leading a criminal enterprise that caused the death of Reba Golden. She died during an illegal drug test conducted by Wyss’s company in 2007.
The Washington suit charges Wyss, the former CEO of a Pennsylvania-based medical device company called Synthes and his co-defendants with murder in the second degree as a class A felony, second degree assault and criminal profiteering under the Washington Criminal Profiteering Act.
Wyss faces a statutory civil penalty of $250,000 for each violation, amounting to $9.2 million for 'personal injury to and death of Mrs. Golden.' He is charged in 37 violations.
The plaintiff is Reba Golden’s daughter, Cynthia Wilson, whose mother died in 2007 on the operating table after Synthes organized illegal 'market tests' for at least 50 persons across the country of an untested bone cement substance that the Food & Drug Administration banned for use in the spine.
Ultimately, five patients died during the illicit drug testing. Synthes failed to report the deaths to the FDA, as required by law, until the third fatality occurred.
Furthermore,
Wyss 'entered into a criminal enterprise to perfo'rm illegal and experimental surgeries on patients,' Daniel Hannula, Golden’s attorney, told The DCNF.
Also,
'Mr. Hansjorg Wyss was the controlling stockholder and ranking executive of Synthes and Norian Corporation and the leader of a criminal enterprise,' the complaint states. 'The criminal enterprise engaged, for profit, in a pattern of criminal profiteering activity,' enticed by the prospect of a company forecast of $3 million in after-tax profit for the first year of sales.
Judge Davis agreed case was about profits, saying their behavior was 'generated by a desire to realize the immense profits.'
Hannula told the DCNF, 'they completely ignored what was required of them in order to get their product to the market as quickly as possible because they recognized that this was a market of huge financial potential.'
These are only allegations, of course. However, again, it is very rare for any top executive of a health care organization to personally face a lawsuit for his or her organization's conduct, no matter how bad that conduct may be.
The Synthes Case Up to Now
We already knew that Synthes' conduct was particularly bad. We last discussed the Synthes case in 2011. The case was already extraordinary in that it resulted in criminal convictions of several high-ranking Synthes executives. At that time we wrote:
Synthes USA, the American branch of a Swiss based device company, first settled charges that it had been paying surgeons with company stock to use its products in its clinical trials in 2009 (see this post). Then prosecutors alleged that these were not really rigorous trials. Instead, for marketing purposes, executives of Synthes subsidiary Norian persuaded surgeons to use its Norian XR product in a case series of spine surgery patients and then publish the results. Three patients who received the product for this "off-label" use died. This scheme was alleged to have been directed by 'person no. 7,' whom journalists identified as the company CEO, Hansjorg Wyss (see post here.) In an unusual move, the prosecutors indicted four company executives, who then pleaded guilty. They did not take any further action against Wyss, who turns out to be one of the world's richest men (see post here).
In 2011, Wyss agreed to sell Synthes to Johnson and Johnson, itself a company with a very chequered past (look here), thus making himself into a multi-billionaire, and one of the world's richest men. (Currently, Forbes lists Wyss as number 240 on its list of the world's richest, estimating his fortune at $6.1 billion.)
The case then slipped into relative obscurity, although Fortune ran a long-form article on it in 2012, which called it a "medical horror story."
An Almost Anechoic Lawsuit
Because of the unusual nature of the ongoing lawsuit, one might expect that it would generate some public discussion. One would be wrong. The litigation against Mr Wyss so far has received almost no media coverage, demonstrating the ongoing anechoic effect. We previous defined the anechoic effect, as the phenomenon that information or discussion that could challenge or discomfit the powers that be in the US health care often generates no echoes.
To date, I could only find coverage of the ongoing lawsuit against Mr Wyss in the Daily Caller. And ironically the Daily Caller did not appear to cover this case because it specializes in malfeasance in health care. It seemed to cover it because it may have indirectly reflected negatively on prominent members of the US Democratic Party.
Actually, the main focus of the article I quoted above was not health care. It was that Mr Wyss appears to be a supporter of Hilary Clinton, the currently leading Democratic candidate for the US presidential nomination, and of ostensibly left-wing causes. I put an ellipsis in the first sentence of the article to allow me to focus on its health care aspects. What I removed was not a description of Mr Wyss not as an extremely rich former CEO of a medical device company, but as
Hansjorg Wyss, a prominent Clinton foundation donor and wealthy bankrolled of liberal activist groups, will face charges of running a 'criminal profiteering enterprise'....
And the article's title similarly did not mention health care at all:
Major Clinton Donor Faces 'Criminal Profiteering' Charges
The Daily Caller actually specializes not in health care malfeasance, but in issues of interest to the right wing. As Politico reported in 2014, Tucker Carlson, described as a "conservative pundit, who founded the Daily Caller, has said
What I despise most about the legacy media isn’t just that they’re mindlessly liberal, though they are.
The Columbia Journalism Review described the Daily Caller as having
carved out a cozy corner of the web in its short life. It’s a place for conservatives to read about the latest liberal scandal and the latest movements in the GOP presidential field.So presumably if Mr Wyss was uninterested in politics, and did not donate to any remotely left wing causes, the Daily Caller would not have covered the ongoing lawsuit, leaving it totally anechoic.
But whether of not the Daily Caller had an axe to grind when making its choice to report on the ongoing litigation against Mr Wyss, why did every other media outlet to ignore the story? Perhaps again the rule is in general it is simply not done to publicly discuss what might excessively embarass the people who have gotten very rich from the currently dysfunctional health care system?
Conclusions
The just revealed story of the lawsuit against the extremely rich former CEO of Synthes does suggest that perhaps individuals injured by our curent dysfunctional health care system could use the legal system to try to challenge those who get rich from enabling such injuries. Or not, because the outcome of this lawsuit is uncertain.
Furthermore, the initiation of this lawsuit again reminds us that those who lead large health care organizations, and may profit mightily from them, regardless of the effects on patients' and the public's health, remain beyond the law. It is not clear why the US Department of Justice chose not to even attempt to prosecute Mr Wyss, although they apparently believed he was responsible for directing the actions that led to patient deeaths. But his impunity mirrors that granted to just about every top health care manager who authorized or directed corporate bad behavior that endangered patients.
This impunity is further enabled by how anechoic stories of bad leadership of health care organizations, even of apparently criminal or corrupt leadership, are. As long as most health care professionals and the public at large remain unaware of the dark side of health care, they are unlikely to seek light to shed upon it.
True health care reform would encourage open, widespread discussion of all aspects of health care dysfunction, particularly bad behavior by those who profit most from it, and would encourage health care leadership that puts patients' and the public health first, is willing to be accountable for its actions, is transparent, honest and ethical.
